Most innovations probably arise from intuitions; the
intuitions are triggered by external observations of reality or changes in
society. How did calculus come to be invented at roughly the same time by
Newton (b. 1643) and by Leibnitz (b. 1646); the occasion was a desire to predict
mathematically points on a geometrical curve. It’s easy to predict the location
of a point on a line; but when the damned thing is sloping away from you in an
ark, not easy. The desire in both cases was powerful, the need to get good
answers pressing. The new math worked! In due time we’ve come to formalize its
procedures into calculus. And now it is institutionalized; it is taught in
school. The reason why most people frown, their features signaling unease, when
calculus is mentioned is because the method has become institutionalized.
People taking calculus don’t have the burning need to understand curves in
order, say, to understand the orbits of planets. Institutionalization makes it
relatively easy to learn an art; no invention is necessary, no repetitive testing,
frustration, torn up sheets, and back to the start. At the same time, if the
art is a difficult one—and is taught because it’s part of some grand scheme
(you want to graduate in some science eventually); it is rarely taught in
answer to a burning urge.
Looking around I can at least imagine some time in the
future when much of what we now experience as twenty-first century culture may
have been largely lost, especially the complicated parts. Then some people in
the future may meet the problem of the curve again. Those experiencing the difficulties
will once more be powerfully motivated to find the math to help them. Imagine
such a group when one of its members bursts into a laboring group; he’s holding some ancient book. “It’s been done
before,” he cries. “And it’s all in here. A little hard to understand, but it’s
the answer.” The mood in the room can almost be felt. And it represents what I’d
call Reform: the renewal of an art that began as an intuition, got
institutionalized, and now will be reformed. The reform will be present because
this new group will make additional innovations to the math while trying to
understand that ancient text.
This subject is of value in the context of my current
ponderings. Everything we live now was once an innovation; many things have
become ritualized so they no longer live in us as driving needs. And institutionalization
is followed by decay. Reform, however, has no doubt already begun—even if we
don’t fully see it yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.