In a recent conversation, someone said: “Now as for the
international news, who can possibly make any sense of that?”
This morning I noted, once more, anguish in the media over
weak GDP numbers in Europe, with Germany, France, and Italy all showing negative
growth. Angela Merkel is blamed and quoted as saying something like: “How long
can you keep on going if you spend more than you take in?” That stance of hers
is labeled as “austerity”; austerity, in turn, is turning into a four-letter
word. But what Merkel is saying makes pretty good sense to me.
My own typical response to such questions is always to look
at fundamentals. The comfort to be gained from that is minimal. One can see the
picture clearly, but as for “What can be done?” the answer is almost always “Virtually
nothing.” And in large part that is because nobody actually wants to look at
fundamentals (except perhaps Angela Merkel) or is willing to do anything about
it. The phenomena in question are also produced by such huge collectives that “doing
something” is largely impossible; even very large collectives, like the United
States, lack the means—often because of internal conflicts.
My reaction to the Growth Tremors in Europe are presented
briefly on LaMarotte (link).
As for the international news—by which the speaker was addressing the ISIS
phenomenon in Syria and Iraq and the tug-of-war in the Ukraine—a look at
fundamentals once more produces clear but unsatisfying answers. Unsatisfying?
Yes. They displease those operating under a delusion that something like
Progress is the benevolent penumbra under which civilization is unfolding and
that the United States is its leading superintendent.
I’ve yet to see my view of the ISIS problem echoed anywhere.
It is that this attempt to establish a caliphate is just another no doubt
passing event in a much broader cultural transformation of the Muslim world
which would be going on even if Europe had never risen to world power and
America had never been discovered. Thus it is an internal cultural battle, akin to a Reformation. A decadent Muslim
world is in upheaval. The reason why we are so powerfully drawn to interfere
with it is the coincidence that a major portion
of the (slowly disappearing) oil resources of the world are more or less
controlled by Muslim countries. Therefore, under the guise of bringing
Democracy to the heathen, we are trying to control developments in a region
that is impelled by much deeper cultural forces to undergo a major change.
As for the Ukraine, it is simply a fact that Russia will
never tolerate what is a fundamentally hostile culture—Western Capitalism—to
take a firm footing on its very border—and a border largely populated on both
sides by ethnic Russians. Russia’s reaction is quite fundamental. And Russia is
large and strong enough—and Capitalism way too distracted—to produce a solution
by appeals to abstract principles.