Showing posts with label Higgs Boson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Higgs Boson. Show all posts

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Higgs' Digs

The boys—and surely also ladies—
Who run the tunnels hot as Hades
In Switzerland, a place called CERN,
Where Hadron rules and people learn
Just how matter’s put together
Has mass or is as light as feather—
The girls, I say, but most are boys,
And big colliders are their toys,
Were celebrating Peter Higgs
At their accelerated digs,
The man whose boson or whose field
They hoped, still hope, will someday yield
The necessary gravity,
Lest world becomes a cavity
Where only light-speed particles
Fly by like cyber articles;
Where things do not cohere, for mass
Is gone, was never there; and gas,
That thinnest of all stuff we know,
Would not exists. And that is so
Because if Higgs were absent from
This sphere, we cannot go or come.
There would be too much symmetry.
There wouldn’t be a galaxy.
Thank heaven therefore for the Higgs.
It surely saves our humble digs.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

A Higgs Gem

Fans of physics are undoubtedly aware of the fact that recently the folks at the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva undertook tests to detect the Higgs boson. It’s called “the God particle,” named that by Leon M. Lederman, a Nobel laureate in physics, because of its great importance for understanding matter—although he says, in jest, that he called it that because his publishers refused to let him call his book The Goddamned Particle instead—and that because the problem is so difficult and expensive to solve. The Higgs boson is thought to give matter its mass.

Now there is no subject more obscure than quantum physics—not because it really is but because the practitioners of this art are unwilling to discuss it in plain English. I sometimes think that they might refuse because, once spelled out, ordinary people might not be quite so impressed. But occasionally one finds some accessible explanations. I did, and I’d like to share it. Call it a Higgs pentahedron, something of a gem. Back in 1993 William Waldegrave, science minister in the United Kingdom, challenged physics to give a one-page answer to this question: “What is the Higgs boson, and why do we want to find it?” The journal Physics published five winning entries, and these are accessible here.

The answers, taken together, give a very good understanding, particularly David Miller’s—but that one is really further illuminated by reading the others. Such clarity is extremely rare—like real gems.

What I got out of it is that in physics there are fields, and one of them is the Higgs field. Now to understand “field,” think of a lake. That’s the field. But when energy in some way disturbs that lake, why then there are waves. Call each wave a “particle.” As there are no lakes without waves, there are no fields without particles, and the Higgs field has its own, the Higgs boson. It’s not really, like, a thing—just like the photon isn’t either. The photon is the wave in the lake called electromagnetism. You’re in the picture, I think. It is also quite evident that such mysterious lakes and particles arise from mathematical models built to make sense of observations—thus in the subatomic realm from photographs taken of “particle” collisions at such places as the Large Hadron Collider.