A quite interesting article in the American Conservative, “Freedom or Virtue?” by Donald Devine, cites
part of an interview another author (E.J. Dionne Jr.) held with then Cardinal
Joseph Ratzinger, later Pope Benedict XVI. Ratzinger had been asked how he
could “insist on moral positions that conflicted with the views of a majority
of Americans of his own tradition. Why could he not compromise with those
people, who mostly took libertarian views on social issues, especially on
sexual matters?” I quote the next paragraph in that article:
Ratzinger replied: “If it is true that a Christian faith taken
seriously means nonconformity with a not inconsiderable number of contemporary
social standards, then a more or less negative image is unavoidable.” Ratzinger
concluded that in a confused world, the obligation of a moral tradition,
Christian or otherwise, is to recover the capacity for nonconformity rather
than seeking either elite or mass approval.
Brigitte was reading this out loud to me yesterday on what
must have been the loveliest day of the season yet. And this passage certainly
resonated with us. In effect it represents what some call “the third way,” thus
avoiding reflexive adherence to this camp or that, participating in the collective
social labor without merging with fashion, in effect to be in this world but
not of it.
The article is not yet available on the Internet, but it
should appear in a month or two. Worth reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.