Symbol cleansing, which is a more or less harmless public
activity—harmless because it does not produce huge refugee camps and deaths—is
temporarily on the upswing. The Washington Redskins are coming under pressure
to give their team a politically less offensive name. Not Braves, surely, which
is another way to refer to once war-like traits of what? Native North
Americans? This landmass had other names
back then, therefore “American” may have a faint smell too—as might Indigenous
North Americans. We should settle on the Washington Helmets—if that word were
not so “defensive”; and Washington Aggressors might be troublesome too—because
it used to be, in my Army days, the euphemistic reference to Russians.
This coming Sunday the Redskins face the Cowboys. The number
of cowboys in the population presently is not particularly large—or else a
lobby would be formed to get rid of “boys,” substituting Cowmen and Cowwomen—unless
the U.S. Livestock Association takes umbrage at the use of “cow” or some really
wild macho group demands that “bull” be added to the Dallas team’s name, as in
the Dallas Bullmen.
It helps when the symbol chosen has no active constituency. Also
on the field next Sunday will be the Denver Broncos facing the Jacksonville
Jaguars. The earth today has very few spots where broncos actually roam. That
word literally means “wild” in Spanish; but the word has been applied to horses long enough so that even the
Spanish have forgotten that the word comes from “knot,” as on an unwelcome,
gnarled thickening on an otherwise smooth branch, therefore “rough” and, by
extension, “wild.” Now as for jaguars, that species of cat is now in the
near-threatened category— as will be the names of sports clubs using that tag after
we’ve finally cleared the PC reservation of frowned upon remnants of our own (actually
fairly recent) history. In the future—after my ashes have been strewn into the
ever rising sea—the Denver Knots may meet the Jacksonville Spots—and if people
object to that, we shall eventually have the Jacksonville Homo Habilis in
mortal combat with the Denver Homo Erectus, and in the ever larger PC activist
community, the target will have become “homo,” an obviously male noun in Latin
and therefore offensive. Look out Linnaeus.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.