How can we ever hope to understand very large aggregates of
anything? The first step, in any such venture, is to collect statistics. Once
such collection is institutionalized—and data become available over some span
of time—changes in the measured category may be detected by analysis. And any
action taken to change or influence that aggregate can also be tracked—again
with statistics.
Around here we fondly remember Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the
activist Democratic senator—also a sociologist. In his engagement in the War on
Poverty, he always urged the Bureau of the Census or the Bureau of Labor
Statistics to set up new data collections. He knew full well that managing mass
phenomena begins with numbers.
But collecting information is expensive. Suppose, however,
that you’re already collecting it, but for another reason. Supposing that, in
keeping records, a company captures hundreds, thousands, millions of various
kinds of transactions—and saves these data for legal purposes. It was and still
is done. Back in the ancient times these data were held on paper. In the early
computer age on tape. It took a while before the secondary value of such data
came to be recognized. I don’t remember when exactly—but my guess is that it
was in the 1980s—data mining began to surface as a useful method of milking
some value from these “givens.”
(Anciently I looked up data
and discovered what the word means—just facts as recorded.)
The term used back then, mining,
was quite appropriate in an age when old records were on cumbersome magnetic
tape—and you had to read, rather slowly, many, many of them to get, say, ten
years’ worth of history. After that analysis could begin—and new patterns would
emerge.
Since the 1980s, massive technological changes have caused
the transformation of ho-hum data mining into the new celebrity industry of
Cybernetic Spying. Two new stories in today’s New York Times reminded me of that. One talks about NSA collecting
images of faces from the electronic traffic; recognition software is in full
development. The other is a story about a company called Palantir Technologies.
The company is privately held but valued at around $9 billion; the story deals
with the impatience of investors in the company because Palantir is unwilling
as yet to go public. The company’s business? Cybernetic spying. The company’s
name comes from Tolkien. A palantir is a magic stone that a very corrupt wise
man, Saruman the White, uses to spy on the world. Very interesting choice of
company name. The company, with Pay Pal figures active in its initiation, was initially
funded by the CIA which, curiously—first time I’ve ever heard of it—has a “venture
fund.”
Some fiction writers have quite prophetic powers—and Tolkien
was one. We already have at least one palantir—and no doubt there are actually
dozens. But where is Frodo Baggins? And never mind Gandalf the Grey…
Every time I take Metro through Pentagon station, I see advertisements for Palantir on the ad boards. Goes back a few years now if I remember correctly. They still make me snicker, and then freak me out. The founders either have a funny, geeky sense of humor, or they are wildly, terrifyingly lacking in self-awareness. It's right up there with proudly endorsing Soma or Soylent Green, naming a train company "Goebbels," an investment firm "Mammon," etc.
ReplyDeleteRob
My sentiments exactly, Rob. Your commute recalls my own, which was once by bus. The bus stopped there too--and used to half-empty as the military folks got off. These days if you are one of the big hitters in cyber companies, you have to be under 40--and so busy that a close reading of Tolkien cannot be fit into a frantic schedule.
ReplyDelete