We saw the Danish film Ordet,
which means “the word,” made in 1955 by Carl Theodor Dreyer based on a play by
Kaj Munk first performed in 1932. The movie is impressive in part because it
embodies a kind of contradiction. It is an art film and, simultaneous, a
religious film. It is long, ritualistic in its mode of presentation, yet builds
incredible tension. Seen in the right company, it will generate discussion that
will last at least as long as the film itself. Ordet is the kind of film best left undescribed to enable those who
might want to see it to experience its full impact. It is available from
Netflix.
I got to thinking about ritual. Ritual is strongly
associated with religious experience at every level, even down to the trivially
superstitious: touch wood, black cat, spilled salt. Art film, in my own mind, and
any “art” one is tempted to put in quotes, represents the piety of Humanism. It
does not contrast so much with traditional ritual behavior as it updates it for
elites. For the ordinary folk sentimentality will suffice. In Ordet a kind of tension arises because
the technique of Humanistic ritual is used to tell a religious story—straight,
you might say. Art films are not supposed to deal with that subject seriously.
Or perhaps the times are changing. I put “Art Film” on
Google. The first item that comes up, of course, is the Wikipedia article on
the subject. To my surprise the first image shown in that article is a portrait
of Carl Theodor Dreyer celebrating his The
Passion of Joan of Arc, a 1928 film.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.