An interesting article in The American Conservative (Nov/Dec 2014), titled “‘Duck Dynasty’ vs
Dante,” reminded me again that no really decent statistics on politics are
available to the general public. Economic statistics are available; but you have to pay real dollars for political
statistics. Therefore it is difficult to check, using numbers, opinions, as
those in this article, that the shift in ideology in the United States
represents a movement from urban to rural. I always marvel at the detail that
CNN, for instance is able to show in its coverage. Such data must cost a ton of
money—but the people’s right to know does not extend to a right easily to
analyze those numbers.
Half-heartedly looking for some, I found at least a few numbers
looking backward provided by the Brookings Institution (link).
These show the shift in dominance of the House and Senate, between 1991 and
2013—thus excluding the results of the most recent election—by regions of the
country. Here is the tabulation:
Democratic Strength, in
Percent, in House and Senate, in 1991
and 2013
|
||||
House
|
Senate
|
|||
1991-1992
|
2013-2014
|
1991-1992
|
2013-2014
|
|
102nd
|
103rd
|
102nd
|
103rd
|
|
South
|
66.4
|
29.0
|
68.2
|
27.3
|
Border
|
67.4
|
36.6
|
60.0
|
50.0
|
New England
|
66.7
|
100.0
|
58.3
|
66.6
|
Mid-Atlantic
|
56.9
|
60.3
|
50.0
|
90.0
|
Midwest
|
61.2
|
38.4
|
70.0
|
60.0
|
Plains
|
54.2
|
33.3
|
58.3
|
41.7
|
Rocky Mountains
|
45.8
|
41.9
|
37.5
|
43.8
|
Pacific
|
60.6
|
70.4
|
40.0
|
90.0
|
Democratic regions
|
8
|
3
|
5
|
4
|
This tabulation still identifies the border states as a
separate region. They are Missouri, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Delaware. Note
the dominance of the Democrats in the 1991-1992 Congress (8 of 8 regions) and
near dominance in the Senate (5 of 8 regions). Twenty-three years later, the
dominance has swung to the other side—but four regions are still hanging on to
the Democratic view of things. I show them in bold type.
I’ll look some more. One of the great puzzles, for Brigitte
and me, is this general trend. People are getting poorer—and more Republican.
Something’s oddly askew. Perhaps it is those gerrymandered districts. Or could
it all be just Fox News?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.